|
There is little doubt that the Iroquois negotiators acted, for
the moment, in sincerity. Guillaume Couture, who returned with them
and spent the winter in their towns, saw sufficient proof that they
sincerely desired peace. And yet the treaty had a double defect.
First, the wayward, capricious, and ungoverned nature of the Indian
parties to it, on both sides, made a speedy rupture more than
likely. Secondly, in spite of their own assertion to the contrary,
the Iroquois envoys represented, not the confederacy of the five
nations, but only one of these nations, the Mohawks: for each of the
members of this singular league could, and often did, make peace and
war independently of the rest.
It was the Mohawks who had made war on the French and their Indian
allies on the lower St. Lawrence. They claimed, as against the other
Iroquois, a certain right of domain to all this region; and though
the warriors of the four upper nations had sometimes poached on the
Mohawk preserve, by murdering both French and Indians at Montreal,
they employed their energies for the most part in attacks on the
Huron, the Upper Algonquins, and other tribes of the interior. These
attacks still continued, unaffected by the peace with the Mohawks.
Imperfect, however, as the treaty was, it was invaluable, could it
but be kept inviolate; and to this end Montmagny, the Jesuits, and
all the colony, anxiously turned their thoughts.
[The Mohawks were at this time more numerous, as compared with the
other four nations of the Iroquois, than they were a few years
later. They seem to have suffered more reverses in war than any of
the others. At this time they may be reckoned at six or seven
hundred warriors. A war with the Mohegans, and another with the
Andastes, besides their war with the Algonquins and the French of
Canada soon after, told severely on their strength. The following
are estimates of the numbers of the Iroquois warriors made in 1660
by the author of the Relation of that year, and by Wentworth
Greenhalgh in 1677, from personal inspection:--
|
1660 |
1677 |
Mohawk |
500 |
300 |
Oneida |
100 |
200 |
Onondaga |
300 |
350 |
Cayuga |
300 |
300 |
Seneca |
1,000 |
1,000 |
|
2,200 |
2,150 |
It was to hold the Mohawks to their faith that Couture had
bravely gone back to winter among them; but an agent of more
acknowledged weight was needed, and Father Isaac Jogues was chosen.
No white man, Couture excepted, knew their language and their
character so well. His errand was half political, half religious;
for not only was he to be the bearer of gifts, wampum-belts, and
messages from the Governor, but he was also to found a new mission,
christened in advance with a prophetic name,--the Mission of the
Martyrs.
For two years past, Jogues had been at Montreal; and it was here
that he received the order of his Superior to proceed to the Mohawk
towns. At first, nature asserted itself, and he recoiled
involuntarily at the thought of the horrors of which his scarred
body and his mutilated hands were a living memento. [Lettre du P.
Isaac Jogues au B. P. Jérosme L'Allemant. Montreal, 2 Mai, 1646.
MS.] It was a transient weakness; and he prepared to depart with
more than willingness, giving thanks to Heaven that he had been
found worthy to suffer and to die for the saving of souls and the
greater glory of God.
He felt a presentiment that his death was near, and wrote to a
friend, "I shall go, and shall not return." ["Ibo et non redibo."
Lettre du P. Jogues au R. P. No date.] An Algonquin convert gave him
sage advice. "Say nothing about the Faith at first, for there is
nothing so repulsive, in the beginning, as our doctrine, which seems
to destroy everything that men hold dear; and as your long cassock
preaches, as well as your lips, you had better put on a short coat."
Jogues, therefore, exchanged the uniform of Loyola for a civilian's
doublet and hose; "for," observes his Superior, "one should be all
things to all men, that he may gain them all to Jesus Christ." [Lalemant,
Relation, 1646, 15.] It would be well, if the application of the
maxim had always been as harmless.
Jogues left Three Rivers about the middle of May, with the Sieur
Bourdon, engineer to the Governor, two Algonquins with gifts to
confirm the peace, and four Mohawks as guides and escort. He passed
the Richelieu and Lake Champlain, well-remembered scenes of former
miseries, and reached the foot of Lake George on the eve of Corpus
Christi. Thence he called the lake Lac St. Sacrement; and this name
it preserved, until, a century after, an ambitious Irishman, in
compliment to the sovereign from whom he sought advancement, gave it
the name it bears.
[Mr. Shea very reasonably suggests, that a change
from Lake George to Lake Jogues would be equally easy
and appropriate. ] |
From Lake George they crossed on foot to the Hudson, where, being
greatly fatigued by their heavy loads of gifts, they borrowed canoes
at an Iroquois fishing station, and descended to Fort Orange. Here
Jogues met the Dutch friends to whom he owed his life, and who now
kindly welcomed and entertained him. After a few days he left them,
and ascended the River Mohawk to the first Mohawk town. Crowds
gathered from the neighboring towns to gaze on the man whom they had
known as a scorned and abused slave, and who now appeared among them
as the ambassador of a power which hitherto, indeed, they had
despised, but which in their present mood they were willing to
propitiate.
There was a council in one of the lodges; and while his crowded
auditory smoked their pipes, Jogues stood in the midst, and
harangued them. He offered in due form the gifts of the Governor,
with the wampum belts and their messages of peace, while at every
pause his words were echoed by a unanimous grunt of applause from
the attentive concourse. Peace speeches were made in return; and all
was harmony. When, however, the Algonquin deputies stood before the
council, they and their gifts were coldly received. The old hate,
maintained by traditions of mutual atrocity, burned fiercely under a
thin semblance of peace; and though no outbreak took place, the
prospect of the future was very ominous.
The business of the embassy was scarcely finished, when the Mohawks
counseled Jogues and his companions to go home with all dispatch,
saying, that, if they waited longer, they might meet on the way
warriors of the four upper nations, who would inevitably kill the
two Algonquin deputies, if not the French also. Jogues, therefore,
set out on his return; but not until, despite the advice of the
Indian convert, he had made the round of the houses, confessed and
instructed a few Christian prisoners still remaining here, and
baptized several dying Mohawks. Then he and his party crossed
through the forest to the southern extremity of Lake George, made
bark canoes, and descended to Fort Richelieu, where they arrived on
the twenty seventh of June. [Lalemant, Relation, 1646, 17.]
His political errand was accomplished. Now, should he return to the
Mohawks, or should the Mission of the Martyrs be for a time
abandoned? Lalemant, who had succeeded Vimont as Superior of the
missions, held a council at Quebec with three other Jesuits, of whom
Jogues was one, and it was determined, that, unless some new
contingency should arise, he should remain for the winter at
Montreal. [Journal des Supérieurs des Jésuites. MS.] This was in
July. Soon after, the plan was changed, for reasons which do not
appear, and Jogues received orders to repair to his dangerous post.
He set out on the twenty-fourth of August, accompanied by a young
Frenchman named Lalande, and three or four Huron. [Journal des
Supérieurs des Jésuites. MS.] On the way they met Indians who warned
them of a change of feeling in the Mohawk towns, and the Huron,
alarmed, refused to go farther. Jogues, naturally perhaps the most
timid man of the party, had no thought of drawing back, and pursued
his journey with his young companion, who, like other donnés
of the missions; was scarcely behind the Jesuits themselves in
devoted enthusiasm.
The reported change of feeling had indeed taken place; and the
occasion of it was characteristic. On his previous visit to the
Mohawks, Jogues, meaning to return, had left in their charge a small
chest or box. From the first they were distrustful, suspecting that
it contained some secret mischief. He therefore opened it, and
showed them the contents, which were a few personal necessaries; and
having thus, as he thought, reassured them, locked the box, and left
it in their keeping. The Huron prisoners in the town attempted to
make favor with their Iroquois enemies by abusing their French
friends,--declaring them to be sorcerers, who had bewitched, by
their charms and mummeries, the whole Huron nation, and caused
drought, famine, pestilence, and a host of insupportable miseries.
Thereupon, the suspicions of the Mohawks against the box revived
with double force, and they were convinced that famine, the pest, or
some malignant spirit was shut up in it, waiting the moment to issue
forth and destroy them. There was sickness in the town, and
caterpillars were eating their corn: this was ascribed to the
sorceries of the Jesuit. [Lettre de Marie de l'Incarnation à son
Fils. Québec, . . . 1647.] Still they were divided in opinion. Some
stood firm for the French; others were furious against them. Among
the Mohawks, three clans or families were predominant, if indeed
they did not compose the entire nation,--the clans of the Bear, the
Tortoise, and the Wolf. [See Introduction.]
Though, by the nature of their constitution, it was scarcely
possible that these clans should come to blows, so intimately were
they bound together by ties of blood, yet they were often divided on
points of interest or policy; and on this occasion the Bear raged
against the French, and howled for war, while the Tortoise and the
Wolf still clung to the treaty. Among savages, with no government
except the intermittent one of councils, the party of action and
violence must always prevail. The Bear chiefs sang their war-songs,
and, followed by the young men of their own clan, and by such others
as they had infected with their frenzy, set forth, in two bands, on
the war-path.
The warriors of one of these bands were making their way through the
forests between the Mohawk and Lake George, when they met Jogues and
Lalande. They seized them, stripped them, and led them in triumph to
their town. Here a savage crowd surrounded them, beating them with
sticks and with their fists. One of them cut thin strips of flesh
from the back and arms of Jogues, saying, as he did so, "Let us see
if this white flesh is the flesh of an oki."--"I am a man
like yourselves," replied Jogues; "but I do not fear death or
torture. I do not know why you would kill me. I come here to confirm
the peace and show you the way to heaven, and you treat me like a
dog."1"You shall die to-morrow," cried
the rabble. "Take courage, we shall not burn you. We shall strike
you both with a hatchet, and place your heads on the palisade, that
your brothers may see you when we take them prisoners."2
The clans of the Wolf and the Tortoise still raised their voices in
behalf of the captive Frenchmen; but the fury of the minority swept
all before it.
In the evening,--it was the eighteenth of October,--Jogues, smarting
with his wounds and bruises, was sitting in one of the lodges, when
an Indian entered, and asked him to a feast. To refuse would have
been an offence. He arose and followed the savage, who led him to
the lodge of the Bear chief. Jogues bent his head to enter, when
another Indian, standing concealed within, at the side of the
doorway, struck at him with a hatchet. An Iroquois, called by the
French Le Berger,3 who seems to have
followed in order to defend him, bravely held out his arm to ward
off the blow; but the hatchet cut through it, and sank into the
missionary's brain. He fell at the feet of his murderer, who at once
finished the work by hacking off his head. Lalande was left in
suspense all night, and in the morning was killed in a similar
manner. The bodies of the two Frenchmen were then thrown into the
Mohawk, and their heads displayed on the points of the palisade
which enclosed the town.4
Thus died Isaac Jogues, one of the purest examples of Roman Catholic
virtue which this Western continent has seen. The priests, his
associates, praise his humility, and tell us that it reached the
point of self-contempt,--a crowning virtue in their eyes; that he
regarded himself as nothing, and lived solely to do the will of God
as uttered by the lips of his Superiors. They add, that, when left
to the guidance of his own judgment, his self-distrust made him very
slow of decision, but that, when acting under orders, he knew
neither hesitation nor fear. With all his gentleness, he had a
certain warmth or vivacity of temperament; and we have seen how,
during his first captivity, while humbly submitting to every caprice
of his tyrants and appearing to rejoice in abasement, a derisive
word against his faith would change the lamb into the lion, and the
lips that seemed so tame would speak in sharp, bold tones of menace
and reproof.
1 Lettre du P. De Quen au R. P. Lallemant; no
date. MS.
2 Lettre de J. Labatie à M. La Montagne, Fort
d'Orange, 30 Oct. 1646. MS.
3 It has been erroneously stated that this brave
attempt to save Jogues was made by the orator Kiotsaton. Le Berger
was one of those who had been made prisoners by Piskaret, and
treated kindly by the French. In 1648, he voluntarily came to Three
Rivers, and gave himself up to a party of Frenchmen. He was
converted, baptized, and carried to France, where his behavior is
reported to have been very edifying, but where he soon died.
"Perhaps he had eaten his share of more than fifty men," is the
reflection of Father Ragueneau, after recounting his exemplary
conduct.--Relation, 1650, 43-48.
4 In respect to the death of Jogues, the best
authority is the letter of Labatie, before cited. He was the French
interpreter at Fort Orange, and, being near the scene of the murder,
took pains to learn the facts. The letter was inclosed in another
written to Montmagny by the Dutch Governor, Kieft, which is also
before me, together with a MS. account, written from hearsay, by
Father Buteux, and a letter of De Quen, cited above. Compare the
Relations of 1647 and 1650.
This site includes some historical
materials that may imply negative stereotypes reflecting the culture or language
of a particular period or place. These items are presented as part of the
historical record and should not be interpreted to mean that the WebMasters in
any way endorse the stereotypes implied.
The Jesuits in North America in the Seventeenth Century, 1867
Jesuits
in North America
|